Although the "Kuznetsov" was in almost all performance are at a disadvantage, chinese military modernization. but if the "Kuznetsov" aircraft carrier number, and the future of China as a strategic rather than tactical strength, we would be in the development of China's participation in regional affairs and global interests play a huge role.
Korean media said, in fact, the first time since 1998, China ordered the Soviet Union, "Kiev" class aircraft carrier "Minsk" was started, it indicates that China has chosen a Soviet aircraft carrier development. But this road is not good for China to go. chinese military modernization.The reason is that the Soviet Union itself does not have the complete aircraft carrier construction and experience. Therefore, China's aircraft carrier from Russia technology available to actually extremely limited. But as a carrier in China, only "primary level", the United States aircraft carrier "university level" some really far away, to Russia's "middle level" seems to be more easy to learn, but also more realistic.
In other words, "Kuznetsov" was and is often the first deployment of U.S. aircraft carriers in Asia, "George Washington" compared to its performance will be fully at a disadvantage.
Measure the strength of an aircraft carrier battle force there are many indicators, the most intuitive for the number of aircraft carrier, carrier-based aircraft performance, carrier-based aircraft carrier take-off frequency and endurance time. "Kuznetsov" was conventionally powered aircraft carrier, nuclear-powered aircraft carrier in relation to the life there is inherent disadvantages. Its full load displacement of 65,000 tons, as opposed to "Washington" less than 35,000 tons. Therefore, it determines the number of its carrier-based aircraft also will be at a great disadvantage. Development in China's aircraft carrier, even if their performance on carrier-based aircraft carrier opportunities than the United States have individual advantages, but relative to the U.S. carrier-based squadrons decades of combat experience,chinese military modernization. the Chinese aircraft carrier in the performance of difficult and the U.S.. In addition, outside the United States, few countries have the design and manufacture of steam catapults experience.Therefore, China is likely to continue to apply in the future aircraft carrier, "Kuznetsov" was flying leaps on the sliding mode, this way as opposed to catapult takeoff take off, there are many disadvantages, such as the direct take-off aircraft carrier frequency limit.
Korean media said, although "Kuznetsov" was the technology gap relative to the large U.S. carriers, but it is still in the development of China's participation in regional affairs and global interests play a huge role. As we all know, the U.S. military, although the world's most powerful military force, but always follows the "unless the position of absolute dominance, chinese military modernization.
In other words, "Kuznetsov" was and is often the first deployment of U.S. aircraft carriers in Asia, "George Washington" compared to its performance will be fully at a disadvantage.
Measure the strength of an aircraft carrier battle force there are many indicators, the most intuitive for the number of aircraft carrier, carrier-based aircraft performance, carrier-based aircraft carrier take-off frequency and endurance time. "Kuznetsov" was conventionally powered aircraft carrier, nuclear-powered aircraft carrier in relation to the life there is inherent disadvantages. Its full load displacement of 65,000 tons, as opposed to "Washington" less than 35,000 tons. Therefore, it determines the number of its carrier-based aircraft also will be at a great disadvantage. Development in China's aircraft carrier, even if their performance on carrier-based aircraft carrier opportunities than the United States have individual advantages, but relative to the U.S. carrier-based squadrons decades of combat experience,chinese military modernization. the Chinese aircraft carrier in the performance of difficult and the U.S.. In addition, outside the United States, few countries have the design and manufacture of steam catapults experience.Therefore, China is likely to continue to apply in the future aircraft carrier, "Kuznetsov" was flying leaps on the sliding mode, this way as opposed to catapult takeoff take off, there are many disadvantages, such as the direct take-off aircraft carrier frequency limit.
Korean media said, although "Kuznetsov" was the technology gap relative to the large U.S. carriers, but it is still in the development of China's participation in regional affairs and global interests play a huge role. As we all know, the U.S. military, although the world's most powerful military force, but always follows the "unless the position of absolute dominance, chinese military modernization.
or will not be a decisive battle," the Western classic theory of war. In American eyes, what is "absolute advantage" mean? To the Gulf War, for example, to deal with Iraq, gathered a total of six U.S. Navy aircraft carrier battle groups, but the naval forces in Iraq and the Persian Gulf was completely eliminated all of mine before the end of the task, they have not allowed to enter the pre-war area. Imagine if the United States to block China's 18,000 km-long coastline is far stronger than Iraq and the strength of the Chinese navy, the number of U.S. Navy aircraft carrier battle groups need to use? Even if China has an aircraft carrier and then it?
In addition, the "Kuznetsov" was initially made, and China will increase the carrier's service areas of foreign operations in the United States is not self-confidence. Perhaps this is weird, but look at the history of U.S. foreign operations, will find that the American character, which is not self-confidence is very serious.If you read the past two world wars of U.S. soldiers entering the letters from home, they would find that today are considered "invincible fighter" of U.S. soldiers in the face of war and death really is and not how the fragile self-confidence. If you really go to war with China, how many Americans dare to join this view are not in their own chance of winning the war?
No comments:
Post a Comment